The main reason I chose this book is because of the author, John Steinbeck. I like his writing style because it is very straightforward and is not too flowery like other classics I have read like The Scarlet Letter and A Tale of Two Cities. However, The Grapes of Wrath is comparatively long compared to Steinbeck's other books but is, nevertheless, able to stay to the point. As I stated in the text connections entry, I liked Steinbeck’s use of dialogue to drive the story. This gave me a real understanding of what his characters were like, and kept the book moving. On the other hand, this book was different from Steinbeck’s other books because it is not as concise and thoroughly edited, so it dragged in the middle. One reason I like this book is its connection and accuracy to history. While reading this book, I was studying the Great Depression in History class. My knowledge from History gave me a much better understanding of the social problems during the Great Depression and enhanced my reading experience and, in turn, enhanced my knowledge of History. Tenant farmers were perhaps the hardest hit portion of society during the Great Depression, and John Steinbeck explores how they were exploited, excluded from society, and unfairly looked down on, very accurate to actual history. The Grapes of Wrath is such a highly regarded book because of its vivid yet accurate portrayal of an important part in
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Personal Review
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I also related this book to the Scarlet Letter, although I did notice that there were a few rather long sentnces that included a lot of detail.
ReplyDeleteThere were, but I think that the dialogue was very prominent in regards to the plot line and the feel of the book.
ReplyDeleteThe rather long sentences, yes, were long an detailed, but they were still straight-forward and easy to follow, unlike the Scarlet Letter where it was difficult to even get the gist of what Hawthorne was saying.
ReplyDeletePersonally I enjoy the flowery diction of writers such as Nathaniel Hawthorne, but, like Sam I did enjoy the conciseness of Steinbeck's writing. Of course it is not as concise as his much shorter book The Pearl, however, length is a large contributor to that. Ultimately I enjoyed the novel, even though the positives and negatives for me where very equal, what it came down to for me was Steinbeck's depiction of the Great Depression.
ReplyDelete